Changelog: https://metacpan.org/changes/distribution/SQL-Abstract-More
PR: 276490
Approved by: ...
(Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D)
git commit --author ...
Differential D44574
databases/p5-SQL-Abstract-More: Update to 1.43 uzsolt on Mar 31 2024, 6:21 PM. Authored by Tags None Referenced Files
Subscribers
Details Changelog: https://metacpan.org/changes/distribution/SQL-Abstract-More PR: 276490 git commit --author ... Poudriere testport passed on 13.2, 13.3, 14.0 (amd64), some warning: Warning: devel/p5-Module-Build was in Perl CORE. Check with `corelist Portlint, portfmt, portclippy look fine. make test passed.
Diff Detail
Event TimelineComment Actions Sorry, I forgot the PR link: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=276490 Comment Actions On my box security/p5-openxpki-i18n fails which is a dependency of security/p5-openxpki (which also depends on this port), until that port is fixed so we can build the other one it's "on hold" status Comment Actions Daniel, Most probably there is a misunderstanding.
port A: security/p5-openxpki If port X depends (directly or indirectly) from port Y, let us designate this dependency with symbolic expressions as: "X -> Y" or "Y <- X". Then dependencies between 3 mentioned ports are as follows: B <- A -> C This symbolic expression is evident from looking at the page: https://ports.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=xpki&stype=all&sektion=all That is, our port C (being considered here) is needed to build port A. But ports A and B are irrelevant for building of port C.
14.0-RELEASE-p6
Hope this helps. Comment Actions Oh, it seems that I am beginning to understand the meaning of Daniel's comment. Port security/p5-openxpki-i18n (referred to as port B above) fails to build after recent updates to gettext. This failure happens with or without applying a patch for port databases/p5-SQL-Abstract-More, proposed here. Let me investigate further. Thank you so much for the alert. Comment Actions I can build security/p5-openxpki{,-i18n} with updated p5-SQL-Abstract-More, on 13.2, 13.3 and 14.0 (poudriere). Comment Actions Blinking failure of build for port security/p5-openxpki-i18n goes away altogether, if I add a line: MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE= yes to the Makefile of port security/p5-openxpki-i18n, just under the line: USE_GITHUB= yes And again, my tests show, that this blinking problem manifests itself irrespective of applying or not applying the patch (under discussion here) for the port databases/p5-SQL-Abstract-More. I will submit a major stable update of ports security/p5-openxpki{-i18n}, which will address this issue. Hopefully very soon. But IMHO, port databases/p5-SQL-Abstract-More could be updated right away (with the present patch), irrespective of that future major update. Comment Actions Hi, To simplify things, I have submitted a PR with a simple patch to fix blinking build error in existing version of port security/p5-openxpki-i18n: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=279058 Hope this helps. Comment Actions Commit https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=279058 first then this one, Regarding PR 279058: In general for Makefiles we tend to prefer having comments on a separate line rather than to the right but do as you wish. Commit msg for PR 279058 (or something similar): security/p5-openxpki-i18n: Fix build Add MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes due to race conditions during build While at it do some minor adjustments to Makefile Great work :-) |