Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

Document the need to define WITH_CASPER when using casper services
Needs ReviewPublic

Authored by asomers on Dec 19 2022, 11:31 PM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
Unknown Object (File)
Sat, Sep 5, 5:57 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Fri, Sep 4, 10:31 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Aug 8 2026, 10:50 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Aug 8 2026, 9:22 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Jul 24 2026, 2:59 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Jul 22 2026, 9:09 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Jul 21 2026, 3:26 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Jul 12 2026, 3:32 PM
Subscribers

Details

Reviewers
oshogbo
Summary

[skip ci]

MFC after: 1 week
Sponsored by: Axcient

Diff Detail

Repository
rG FreeBSD src repository
Lint
Lint Passed
Unit
No Test Coverage
Build Status
Buildable 48765
Build 45651: arc lint + arc unit

Event Timeline

I think this requires more explanation.
Without this define the casper will work and use standard definition instead of "secure" implementation prepared for capsicum.
This allow to build a tools for FreeBSD without capsicum/casper support - for example for rescue or bootstrap.
Simply putting this define in front of includes will break this behaviour.

I see. Can you suggest better wording, or should I just abandon it and assume that users will figure it out?