Move racct/rctl throttling from userret() to ast(). There's no reason for it to sit in the syscall fast path.
ClosedPublic
Actions

Authored by trasz on Sep 9 2020, 9:21 AM.

Tags

None

Referenced Files

	Unknown Object (File)
	Wed, Oct 7, 12:33 AM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Wed, Oct 7, 12:29 AM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Sun, Sep 27, 11:37 PM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Sun, Sep 27, 11:24 PM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Sun, Sep 27, 11:10 PM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Tue, Sep 22, 1:08 AM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Mon, Sep 21, 9:14 PM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Sun, Sep 20, 7:48 PM

View All Files

Subscribers

imp

Details

Reviewers

kib

Commits

rS365710: Move racct/rctl throttling from userret() to ast(). There's no reason

Diff Detail

Repository

rS FreeBSD src repository - subversion

Lint

Lint Not Applicable

Unit

Tests Not Applicable

Event Timeline

trasz created this revision.Sep 9 2020, 9:21 AM

Herald added a subscriber: imp. · View Herald TranscriptSep 9 2020, 9:21 AM

trasz requested review of this revision.Sep 9 2020, 9:21 AM

Harbormaster completed remote builds in B33451: Diff 76800.Sep 9 2020, 9:21 AM

kib accepted this revision.Sep 9 2020, 1:26 PM

kib added inline comments.

sys/kern/kern_racct.c
1161 ↗	(On Diff #76800)	Why not use forward_signal() there instead of doing basically same manually ?

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Sep 9 2020, 1:26 PM

(Tinderboxed.)

Closed by commit rS365710: Move racct/rctl throttling from userret() to ast(). There's no reason (authored by trasz). · Explain WhySep 14 2020, 9:44 AM

This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.

trasz added a commit: rS365710: Move racct/rctl throttling from userret() to ast(). There's no reason.

Revision Contents
Changeset List

Path

Size

head/

sys/

kern/

kern_racct.c

2 lines

subr_trap.c

9 lines

Diff 76997

View Options

head/sys/kern/kern_racct.c