Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

biology/canu: Upgrade to 1.7 release
ClosedPublic

Authored by jwb on Apr 25 2018, 6:39 PM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
Unknown Object (File)
Mon, Jul 28, 8:53 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Mon, Jul 28, 4:29 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Thu, Jul 17, 5:17 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sat, Jul 5, 6:12 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Jun 24 2025, 11:43 AM
Unknown Object (File)
May 30 2025, 9:24 AM
Unknown Object (File)
May 26 2025, 4:43 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Apr 30 2025, 6:43 AM
Subscribers

Details

Summary

biology/canu: Upgrade to 1.7 release
Approved by jrm (mentor) or wen (mentor)
Differential to be added to commit message

Test Plan

portlint -AC: looks fine
Passed poudriere on {10.4,11.1}-{amd64,i386}
Tested in production

Diff Detail

Repository
rP FreeBSD ports repository
Lint
Lint Not Applicable
Unit
Tests Not Applicable

Event Timeline

biology/canu/Makefile
53 ↗(On Diff #41869)

$$(...) ? It's not an issue here, but there are some compelling arguments. https://mywiki.wooledge.org/BashFAQ/082

Thanks, I'm actually agnostic about things like this (and disagree with any argument that one way should *always* be preferred). I just use whichever syntax is more readable in a given situation. In this case, I think `` is cleaner, because it stands out against the other $ chars in the string. Where there are quotes, I tend to prefer $(). As for nesting output capture, I just avoid it. I'll break it into two commands, the first being a variable assignment. As I've aged, I've shifted toward a preference for readability over hyper-efficiency and cleverness. ( More referring to C syntax regarding efficiency, it's a non-issue in shell commands). ;-)

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Apr 26 2018, 2:29 AM
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.