There is no need for thread storm, wake up the one thread.
ClosedPublic
Actions

Authored by dchagin on Oct 31 2014, 6:32 AM.

Tags

None

Referenced Files

	Unknown Object (File)
	Fri, Oct 17, 5:56 PM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Fri, Oct 17, 2:22 AM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Sat, Oct 11, 5:57 AM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Aug 22 2025, 3:46 PM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Aug 16 2025, 1:05 AM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Aug 10 2025, 12:52 AM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Aug 7 2025, 3:54 PM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Jul 28 2025, 2:40 PM

View All Files

Subscribers

trasz

Details

Reviewers

trasz

Group Reviewers

Linux Emulation

Commits

rS283384: pthread_join() caller do futex_wait on child_clear_tid. As a results

Diff Detail

Lint

No Lint Coverage

Unit

No Test Coverage

Event Timeline

dchagin updated this revision to Diff 2170.Oct 31 2014, 6:32 AM

dchagin retitled this revision from to There is no need for thread storm, wake up the one thread..

dchagin added a reviewer: Linux Emulation.Oct 31 2014, 6:55 AM

What will wake up other threads, if there are any? In other words, can you describe the situation here in a little more detail?

child_clear_id used by pthread_join() where caller do futex_wait on it.
results of multiple simultaneous calls to pthread_join() specifying the same target thread are undefined.

trasz accepted this revision.Mar 27 2015, 10:36 AM

trasz added a reviewer: trasz.

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Mar 27 2015, 10:36 AM

Closed by commit rS283384: pthread_join() caller do futex_wait on child_clear_tid. As a results (authored by dchagin). · Explain WhyMay 24 2015, 2:54 PM

This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.

Revision Contents
Changeset List

Path

Size

sys/

compat/

linux/

linux_emul.c

2 lines

Diff 2170

View Options

sys/compat/linux/linux_emul.c

There is no need for thread storm, wake up the one thread.ClosedPublicActions