HomeFreeBSD

In r380302, I stated that I was leaving the strictures dependency in because

Description

In r380302, I stated that I was leaving the strictures dependency in because
it's so highly recommended by the authors.

On closer inspection, however, the usage of the strictures module must be
manually activated in the calling program, and is otherwise unused. Because
of this, it really doesn't make sense to have strictures be a hard dependency.

So, I'm removing the p5-strictures dependency and bumping PORTREVISION.

Details

Provenance
adamwAuthored on
Parents
rP380384: - Update to 0.87.2
Branches
Unknown
Tags
Unknown

Event Timeline