have numactl tell subprocesses that they are locked to a domain
Needs ReviewPublic
Actions

Authored by lm_mcvoy.com on Nov 30 2017, 5:48 PM.

Tags

None

Referenced Files

	Unknown Object (File)
	Tue, Dec 2, 2:45 AM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Thu, Nov 27, 12:06 PM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Mon, Nov 24, 9:38 PM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Nov 17 2025, 3:20 AM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Nov 16 2025, 10:56 AM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Oct 25 2025, 8:58 PM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Oct 20 2025, 2:36 PM

	Unknown Object (File)
	Oct 20 2025, 2:36 PM

View All 63 Files

Subscribers

bcr

imp

Contributor Reviews (src)

Details

Reviewers

imp

Summary

I'm wacking LMbench to be numa aware and this patch would help me make
sure that when you are a numa machine you could insist that people
run the benchmark via numactl.

Test Plan

Dunno, does FreeBSD have a test harness? Easy enough to add a little test that looks for the var.

Diff Detail

Repository

rS FreeBSD src repository - subversion

Lint

Lint Skipped

Unit

Tests Skipped

Event Timeline

lm_mcvoy.com created this revision.Nov 30 2017, 5:48 PM

Herald added subscribers: Contributor Reviews (src), imp. · View Herald TranscriptNov 30 2017, 5:48 PM

lm_mcvoy.com added a reviewer: imp.Nov 30 2017, 6:24 PM

You need to bump the .Dd in the man page to the date of the commit, since this is a content change.

Revision Contents
Changeset List

Path

Size

	numactl.1.lm
	numactl.1

9 lines

	numactl.c.lm
	numactl.c

1 line

Diff 36014

View Options

numactl.1.lm