Changelog:
https://github.com/lexbor/lexbor/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md
- Remove duplicate PLIST_SUB
- Fix pkg-plist with panopticum(1)
Details
Details
- Reviewers
db yuri alven - Commits
- R11:0e4146097481: www/lexbor: Update 2.4.0 => 2.5.0
For every {amd64, i386} × {14.3, 13.5}:
- Successful poudriere testport
Diff Detail
Diff Detail
- Repository
- R11 FreeBSD ports repository
- Lint
No Lint Coverage - Unit
No Test Coverage - Build Status
Buildable 66294 Build 63177: arc lint + arc unit
Event Timeline
| www/lexbor/pkg-plist | ||
|---|---|---|
| 268 | Need advice: what is better - static or parametrized %%SOVERSION%% and why? | |
Comment Actions
Need advice: what is better - static or parametrized %%SOVERSION%% and why?
Having the parametrized long library suffix is ok: it reduces the work when updating the port.
I used it on some ports and I personally prefer it.
But it's up to you whether you as a maintainer would prefer to have parametrized suffixes.
Comment Actions
Thank you, I also like it and will use it for my ports. :)
I'll update the revision to reflect this (may need re-approval).