www/lexbor: Update 2.4.0 => 2.5.0

[alven]

Summary

Changelog:
https://github.com/lexbor/lexbor/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md

• Remove duplicate PLIST_SUB
• Fix pkg-plist with panopticum(1)

Test Plan

For every {amd64, i386} × {14.3, 13.5}:

• Successful poudriere testport

[alven]

www/lexbor/pkg-plist

268

Need advice: what is better - static or parametrized %%SOVERSION%% and why?

[yuri]

Need advice: what is better - static or parametrized %%SOVERSION%% and why?

Having the parametrized long library suffix is ok: it reduces the work when updating the port.
I used it on some ports and I personally prefer it.
But it's up to you whether you as a maintainer would prefer to have parametrized suffixes.

[yuri]

Approved either way.

Thanks,
Yuri

[alven]

In D51939#1188196, @yuri wrote:

Need advice: what is better - static or parametrized %%SOVERSION%% and why?

Having the parametrized long library suffix is ok: it reduces the work when updating the port.
I used it on some ports and I personally prefer it.
But it's up to you whether you as a maintainer would prefer to have parametrized suffixes.

Thank you, I also like it and will use it for my ports. :)
I'll update the revision to reflect this (may need re-approval).

[alven]

Updating D51939: www/lexbor: Update 2.4.0 => 2.5.0

Keep parametrized SOVERSION