Page MenuHomeFreeBSD
Differential D51873

java/bootstrap-openjdk17: Require compat14x
ClosedPublic
Actions

Authored by des on Aug 12 2025, 1:44 PM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
Unknown Object (File)
Mon, Sep 29, 10:17 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Thu, Sep 25, 5:34 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Fri, Sep 19, 11:37 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Thu, Sep 18, 8:15 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Tue, Sep 16, 5:01 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Tue, Sep 16, 5:26 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Thu, Sep 11, 2:17 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Tue, Sep 9, 7:40 PM
View All 18 Files
Subscribers
None

Details

Reviewers
haraldei_anduin.net
glewis
Commits
R11:f4f80af577fc: java/bootstrap-openjdk17: Require compat14x
Summary

This port installs precompiled binaries which rely on libutil.so.9,
which is replaced by libutil.so.10 in FreeBSD 15 and up.

Diff Detail

Repository
R11 FreeBSD ports repository
Lint
Lint Not Applicable
Unit
Tests Not Applicable

Event Timeline

des requested review of this revision.Aug 12 2025, 1:44 PM
des created this revision.
Harbormaster completed remote builds in B66189: Diff 160239.Aug 12 2025, 1:44 PM
lwhsu added reviewers: haraldei_anduin.net, glewis.Aug 13 2025, 4:37 AM
haraldei_anduin.net added a comment.Aug 13 2025, 11:11 AM

I don't really have an opinion, but it's interesting wrt https://reviews.freebsd.org/D50349.

I'm fine with this change.

des added a comment.Aug 13 2025, 12:21 PM
In D51873#1185795, @haraldei_anduin.net wrote:

I don't really have an opinion, but it's interesting wrt https://reviews.freebsd.org/D50349.

Sorry, I don't see the relevance

This revision was not accepted when it landed; it landed in state Needs Review.Aug 13 2025, 12:31 PM
Closed by commit R11:f4f80af577fc: java/bootstrap-openjdk17: Require compat14x (authored by des). · Explain Why
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
des added a commit: R11:f4f80af577fc: java/bootstrap-openjdk17: Require compat14x.
haraldei_anduin.net added a comment.Aug 13 2025, 12:59 PM
In D51873#1185810, @des wrote:
In D51873#1185795, @haraldei_anduin.net wrote:

I don't really have an opinion, but it's interesting wrt https://reviews.freebsd.org/D50349.

Sorry, I don't see the relevance

If we need different boot-jdk builds for different versions of the OS, that will need to be taken into account if we move towards a solution as outlined in D50349. Mostly just a mental note to myself :)

Revision Contents
Changeset List

PathSize
java/
bootstrap-openjdk17/
5 lines

Diff 160287

View Options

java/bootstrap-openjdk17/Makefile

Loading...