Page MenuHomeFreeBSD
Differential D51873

java/bootstrap-openjdk17: Require compat14x
ClosedPublic
Actions

Authored by des on Aug 12 2025, 1:44 PM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
F156834313: D51873.id160239.diff
Sat, May 16, 7:23 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Wed, May 13, 5:36 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Mon, May 11, 2:19 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Mon, Apr 27, 9:18 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Tue, Apr 21, 6:12 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Apr 6 2026, 11:07 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Apr 6 2026, 10:24 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Mar 29 2026, 1:06 AM
View All 60 Files
Subscribers
None

Details

Reviewers
haraldei
glewis
Commits
R11:f4f80af577fc: java/bootstrap-openjdk17: Require compat14x
Summary

This port installs precompiled binaries which rely on libutil.so.9,
which is replaced by libutil.so.10 in FreeBSD 15 and up.

Diff Detail

Lint
Lint Skipped
Unit
Tests Skipped
Build Status
Buildable 66189
Build 63072: arc lint + arc unit

Event Timeline

des requested review of this revision.Aug 12 2025, 1:44 PM
des created this revision.
Harbormaster completed remote builds in B66189: Diff 160239.Aug 12 2025, 1:44 PM
lwhsu added reviewers: haraldei, glewis.Aug 13 2025, 4:37 AM
haraldei added a comment.Aug 13 2025, 11:11 AM

I don't really have an opinion, but it's interesting wrt https://reviews.freebsd.org/D50349.

I'm fine with this change.

des added a comment.Aug 13 2025, 12:21 PM
In D51873#1185795, @haraldei_anduin.net wrote:

I don't really have an opinion, but it's interesting wrt https://reviews.freebsd.org/D50349.

Sorry, I don't see the relevance

This revision was not accepted when it landed; it landed in state Needs Review.Aug 13 2025, 12:31 PM
Closed by commit R11:f4f80af577fc: java/bootstrap-openjdk17: Require compat14x (authored by des). · Explain Why
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
des added a commit: R11:f4f80af577fc: java/bootstrap-openjdk17: Require compat14x.
haraldei added a comment.Aug 13 2025, 12:59 PM
In D51873#1185810, @des wrote:
In D51873#1185795, @haraldei_anduin.net wrote:

I don't really have an opinion, but it's interesting wrt https://reviews.freebsd.org/D50349.

Sorry, I don't see the relevance

If we need different boot-jdk builds for different versions of the OS, that will need to be taken into account if we move towards a solution as outlined in D50349. Mostly just a mental note to myself :)

Revision Contents
Changeset List

PathSize
java/
bootstrap-openjdk17/
5 lines

Diff 160239

View Options

java/bootstrap-openjdk17/Makefile

Loading...