I fixed the build issues, but look forward to what we need to do to make things work.

In D38806#883259, @imp wrote:

I fixed the build issues, but look forward to what we need to do to make things work.

yes, but if we need for touch > 9 files, that mange *exact* the same two static tables with exact the same content (if we ignore the several typos), then it needs an cleanup / refactor first.

In D38806#883289, @fbsd_paepcke.de wrote:

In D38806#883259, @imp wrote:

I fixed the build issues, but look forward to what we need to do to make things work.

yes, but if we need for touch > 9 files, that mange *exact* the same two static tables with exact the same content (if we ignore the several typos), then it needs an cleanup / refactor first.

Agreed. I fixed the immediate issue, but the problem you points out lingers. There's time for you to do the cleanup / refactor now that the
tree builds again after I broke it last night.

In D38806#883297, @imp wrote:

In D38806#883289, @fbsd_paepcke.de wrote:

In D38806#883259, @imp wrote:

I fixed the build issues, but look forward to what we need to do to make things work.

yes, but if we need for touch > 9 files, that mange *exact* the same two static tables with exact the same content (if we ignore the several typos), then it needs an cleanup / refactor first.

Agreed. I fixed the immediate issue, but the problem you points out lingers. There's time for you to do the cleanup / refactor now that the
tree builds again after I broke it last night.

I'm on it! But I need some more time for tests wired corner cases this time.
And thanks for cd29688e8ec5 - fixing it the right way!