Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

lang/elixir: Update to 1.20.3
AcceptedPublic

Authored by olgeni on Tue, Aug 25, 4:42 PM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
Unknown Object (File)
Sat, Sep 5, 3:34 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Fri, Sep 4, 3:09 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Fri, Sep 4, 2:04 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Thu, Sep 3, 8:33 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Thu, Sep 3, 4:52 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Thu, Sep 3, 1:33 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Wed, Sep 2, 10:15 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Tue, Sep 1, 1:32 AM
Subscribers
None

Details

Reviewers
dch
Summary

Elixir 1.20 requires Erlang/OTP 27 or newer, so tighten BUILD_DEPENDS
from erlang>26 (which an OTP 26.2.x package still satisfies) and refresh
pkg-message accordingly.

ex_doc now writes .build.epub and .build.markdown markers next to the
old .build one, so widen the post-extract cleanup pattern to keep them
out of DOCSDIR. It also emits Markdown alongside every HTML page plus
llms.txt, which accounts for most of the pkg-plist growth.

Diff Detail

Repository
R11 FreeBSD ports repository
Lint
No Lint Coverage
Unit
No Test Coverage
Build Status
Buildable 76157
Build 73040: arc lint + arc unit

Event Timeline

olgeni held this revision as a draft.
olgeni published this revision for review.Tue, Aug 25, 4:44 PM
olgeni removed a reviewer: Erlang.

I’d normally hold off until OTP team or Elixir team releases a full new version but I guess 1.20 is widely used now. Do we have any downstream consumer ports that need testing?

Otherwise LGTM

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Thu, Aug 27, 12:04 PM
In D59184#1358270, @dch wrote:

I’d normally hold off until OTP team or Elixir team releases a full new version but I guess 1.20 is widely used now. Do we have any downstream consumer ports that need testing?

Otherwise LGTM

I think kleene is one, let me check it out..

I think kleene is one, let me check it out..

Seems to build fine :)