lang/go121: Update to 1.21.6

[dutra]

Summary

Poudriere log (amd64): https://poudriere.nulldutra.me/data/latest-per-pkg/go121/1.21.6/
Poudriere log (arm64): https://poudriere-arm64.nulldutra.me/data/latest-per-pkg/go121/1.21.6/

portlint:

looks fine.

commit aa52c39d12f0e3e5accc58a51e25cce3461cdaa6 (HEAD -> main)
Author: Gabriel M. Dutra <[e-mail]>
Date:   Thu Feb 1 00:35:12 2024 -0300

    lang/go121: Update to 1.21.6

    ChangeLog: https://go.dev/doc/devel/release#go1.21.6

    Approved by:    dbaio(mentor), garga(mentor)
    Differential Revision:  https://reviews.freebsd.org/D43699

[dbaio]

Many ports depend on this one, as you are already aware.

In other ports similar to this, it's common to request an exp-run (via Bugzilla) before updating. However, upon reviewing the commit history of the lang/go* ports, it appears that exp-runs are not being requested.

Maybe @dmgk is handling this independently.

For other substantial ports, I prefer to conduct builds in my poudriere, checking all the ports dependent on it and running a poudriere bulk (at least).
Example:

poudriere bulk -f /tmp/list_of_ports.txt -j $jail -p $ports -b latest

After that, performing a few runtime tests.

Maybe you could do this here as well.

@dmgk, are you ok with this? Or could you guide how @dutra can conduct the necessary tests?

Thank you in advance.

[dutra]

In D43699#997082, @dbaio wrote:

Many ports depend on this one, as you are already aware.

In other ports similar to this, it's common to request an exp-run (via Bugzilla) before updating. However, upon reviewing the commit history of the lang/go* ports, it appears that exp-runs are not being requested.

Maybe @dmgk is handling this independently.

For other substantial ports, I prefer to conduct builds in my poudriere, checking all the ports dependent on it and running a poudriere bulk (at least).
Example:

poudriere bulk -f /tmp/list_of_ports.txt -j $jail -p $ports -b latest

After that, performing a few runtime tests.

Maybe you could do this here as well.

@dmgk, are you ok with this? Or could you guide how @dutra can conduct the necessary tests?

Thank you in advance.

In D43699#997082, @dbaio wrote:

Many ports depend on this one, as you are already aware.

In other ports similar to this, it's common to request an exp-run (via Bugzilla) before updating. However, upon reviewing the commit history of the lang/go* ports, it appears that exp-runs are not being requested.

Maybe @dmgk is handling this independently.

For other substantial ports, I prefer to conduct builds in my poudriere, checking all the ports dependent on it and running a poudriere bulk (at least).
Example:

poudriere bulk -f /tmp/list_of_ports.txt -j $jail -p $ports -b latest

After that, performing a few runtime tests.

Maybe you could do this here as well.

@dmgk, are you ok with this? Or could you guide how @dutra can conduct the necessary tests?

Thank you in advance.

Hi, dbaio

Sorry for the delay.

I built three ports with golang 1.21.6: www/grafana, sysutils/terraform, sysutils/terragrunt.
Poudriere compiles all without any problems

See the logs:

AMD64 - 14.0-RELEASE:

• https://poudriere.nulldutra.me/data/latest-per-pkg/grafana/10.3.1/140amd64-HEAD.log
• https://poudriere.nulldutra.me/data/latest-per-pkg/terraform/1.7.0/140amd64-HEAD.log

AMD64 - 15.0-CURRENT:

• https://poudriere.nulldutra.me/data/latest-per-pkg/grafana/10.3.1/150amd64-HEAD.log
• https://poudriere.nulldutra.me/data/latest-per-pkg/terraform/1.7.0/150amd64-HEAD.log

ARM64 - 14.0-RELEASE:

• https://poudriere-arm64.nulldutra.me/data/140aarch64-HEAD/latest-per-pkg/grafana-10.3.1.log
• https://poudriere-arm64.nulldutra.me/data/140aarch64-HEAD/latest-per-pkg/terraform-1.7.0.log

AMD64 - 15.0-CURRENT:

• https://poudriere-arm64.nulldutra.me/data/15aarch64-HEAD/latest-per-pkg/grafana-10.3.1.log
• https://poudriere-arm64.nulldutra.me/data/15aarch64-HEAD/latest-per-pkg/terraform-1.7.0.log