sysutils/rubygem-bundler117: Repocopied from sysutils/rubygem-bundler

[meta]

Summary

Updating systils/rubygem-bundler to 2.0.1 breaks some consumers.
Keep the older version in ports tree and some consumers should refer the older version.

I'm going to update consumer's dependency in this changeset.

[meta]

Add SUBDIR to sysutils/Makefile

[mfechner]

sysutils/Makefile

1124 ↗

(On Diff #55799)

I would not fix it to version 117 but better to version 1, so name the port better rubygem-bundler1

sysutils/rubygem-bundler117/Makefile

8 ↗

(On Diff #55799)

Same we comment above.

24 ↗

(On Diff #55799)

Have you tested this?
There is a high risk that new binary names will break existing installation as they will use bin/bundler and not bin/bundler117 (here you maybe want also to use bundler1 as most port should have dependency ~> 1.17

[mfechner]

You maybe also would like to add a PORTSCOUT line.

[meta]

sysutils/Makefile

1124 ↗

(On Diff #55799)

I looked at ports tree history and there was rubygem-budler17 for bundler 1.7 series. So I follow the past way. However, rubygem-bundler1 sounds better.

sysutils/rubygem-bundler117/Makefile

24 ↗

(On Diff #55799)

Not yet. Looking at past rubygem-bundler17 for bundler 1.7, it doesn't install bundler execurables.
https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-ports/blob/402b279db75bb6b490f4ad23d75b40aa79c1bf0e/sysutils/rubygem-bundler17/Makefile#L21

Maybe it would not be a problem. I think new executable names are better rather than not installing executables so I renamed. Of course I need to test it, though.

[meta]

Rename to rubygem-bundler1

Set PORTEPOCH to 0. It can be reset if a port name changed.

[mfechner]

LGTM, thanks.

[meta]

sysutils/rubygem-bundler117/Makefile

24 ↗

(On Diff #55799)

For the record, devel/gitaly needs to be patched to use bin/bundle1.

[mfechner]

I think that r498360 should fix the problem for bundler version 2 (not tested).