Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

lang/ghc: Cosmetic fixes to Makefile and build.mk files.
ClosedPublic

Authored by arrowd on Oct 21 2018, 7:58 AM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
Unknown Object (File)
Fri, Nov 15, 4:58 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Thu, Nov 14, 7:29 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Thu, Nov 14, 4:15 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sat, Nov 9, 3:44 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Oct 26 2024, 7:33 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sep 24 2024, 11:50 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sep 8 2024, 10:47 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Aug 18 2024, 11:32 PM
Subscribers
None

Details

Test Plan

Built the port with various combinations of OPTIONS as well as with xelatex installed.

Diff Detail

Repository
rP FreeBSD ports repository
Lint
Lint Not Applicable
Unit
Tests Not Applicable

Event Timeline

YES/NO looks indeed to be the propper way: https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Building/Using

lang/ghc/files/build.mk.in
10 ↗(On Diff #49387)

^don't we lose the pdf by that -- or did we never even install the genrated one?

arrowd added inline comments.
lang/ghc/files/build.mk.in
10 ↗(On Diff #49387)

If I get this right, we didn't have PDF in first place due to this xelatex bug.

lang/ghc/files/build.mk.in
10 ↗(On Diff #49387)

is the dependency on sphinx still needed? (I assume it is for the _HTML docs).

arrowd added inline comments.
lang/ghc/files/build.mk.in
10 ↗(On Diff #49387)

The link you posted says that sphinx is used for both HTML and PDF docs, so yes, we still need to have it.

In that case, it looks fine to me.

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Oct 21 2018, 12:23 PM
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.