x11-toolkits/p5-Gtk2-Ex-Utils: Add LICENSE

[bofh]

Summary

• Pass Maintainership [1]

Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/DXXXX
Submitted by: [e-mail]
Approved by: xxxx(mentor)

[marino]

same comment, add (LGPL21) after LICENSE for a more useful commit message

[marino]

hmm, you committed without taking care of my comment again.
Maybe I should use the "request change" disposition? I've been approving these "contingent on this change" approach to save a round of back-and-forth, but the review is getting lost so maybe it's a bad idea on my part.

[bofh]

In D1512#8, @marino wrote:

hmm, you committed without taking care of my comment again.
Maybe I should use the "request change" disposition? I've been approving these "contingent on this change" approach to save a round of back-and-forth, but the review is getting lost so maybe it's a bad idea on my part.

My mistake. But I took care of the second one.

[marino]

I've been using "approved" when the comments are on the level of a suggestion (e.g. the current version is okay, but it could be better). I always use "change requested" for a real problem.

I guess you are going off the email titles, that's where the info gets lost?

[bofh]

In D1512#10, @marino wrote:

I've been using "approved" when the comments are on the level of a suggestion (e.g. the current version is okay, but it could be better). I always use "change requested" for a real problem.

I guess you are going off the email titles, that's where the info gets lost?

Yes. I was. Now I am shifting towards Phabricator only. :)

[marino]

or you could just open the email and see if there was a comment along with the approval. =)

[bofh]

In D1512#12, @marino wrote:

or you could just open the email and see if there was a comment along with the approval. =)

No. I will follow phabricator as I need to make the svn commit message from phabricator. Won't mixup mail and phabricator. :)