ping @ivy
it seems like the review process has stalled. I appreciate your help in getting this moving again.
Thank you!

Thank you all for the reviews.
At this point, I think this revision is ready to land. @ivy, Could you please commit it? is there anything I can help with or do to make it happen?

LGTM

In D49993#1152831, @ivy wrote:

i don't want to make significant changes to the existing reviews if possible, so i'll add this as a new review in the stack and tag you as reviewer.

Thank you for your quick response and working on this awesome feature.

I didn't see this review, and I think what I asked in D49993 belongs here.
So I would write my note here again:

With your changes, without VLAN filtering, can I assume that all interfaces in a bridge are treated as trunk ports?

In D50415#1151177, @ivy wrote:

In D50415#1150645, @p.mousavizadeh_protonmail.com wrote:

The ip6.auto_linklocal is enabled by default, and it could create link-local scope violations without any explicit admin configuration.

but:

1. the bridge will be inet6 ifdisabled on boot by default, so it shouldn't have any link-local addresses unless the admin explicitly enabled inet6 on the bridge, in which case they should expect this

The ip6.auto_linklocal is enabled by default, and it could create link-local scope violations without any explicit admin configuration.
However, I tested the situation without your patch, and the if_bridge wouldn't allow a user to add an interface member without removing its IP addresses, including the link-local one. Therefore, this shouldn't become an issue in this case.

AFAICS, This review is ready to land. Could you please commit this? @ziaee

• ng_ksocket: apply style(9) to tests

Done

• ng_sample: apply style(9)

This is my first experience with ATF and kyua. I would appreciate any guidance or suggestions you might have.

I am strongly in favor of this change. As Lexi mentioned before, users prefer to run all services in jails. I also wanted to do the same for my BGP routers to run OpenBGPd inside jail. However, there was no permission to edit the main system routing table. There are many softwares that only need to edit the routing table, not anything else (interfaces, their IP addresses, ...), like OpenBGPd and many other routing daemons.
I would like to see this permission implemented in FreeBSD.

• Handbook: Add SLAAC to glossary and style the rfc6204w3

@ziaee glossary added. please make sure i have done it right, I try my best to follow the other examples to create the crossref. but couldn't find any tutorial about it.

• Handbook: Improving IPv6 Documentation

@lexi_le-fay.org

• Handbook: Improving IPv6 Documentation

@ziaee Done

Merged into D49782

Merged into D49782

Merged into D49782

Merged into D49782

Merged into D49782

Merged into D49782

Merged into D49782

Merge all of the reviews in the IPv6 section of the handbook into last one, as requested by @ziaee

I'm not sure if using alias in this tutorial is appropriate, or if it would be better to add it to configtuning-virtual-hosts.

@glebius: Also, Here is my github repo as you requested.
spmzt/freebsd-src/tree/ksocket_ipv6: D48204

Bump .Dd in ng_ksocket.4
update value from January 9, 2012 to January 9, 2025