emulators/wine-devel: Add wow64 support
Needs ReviewPublic
Actions

Authored by monwarez_mailoo.org on Mar 31 2026, 7:44 AM.

Details

Reviewers

gerald
iwtcex_gmail.com

Summary

This is a patch of wine-devel to add wow64 support.

It is from https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/8073

Diff Detail

Repository

R11 FreeBSD ports repository

Lint

Lint Skipped

Unit

Tests Skipped

Event Timeline

monwarez_mailoo.org requested review of this revision.Mar 31 2026, 7:44 AM

monwarez_mailoo.org created this revision.

monwarez_mailoo.org created this object with edit policy "Administrators".

monwarez_mailoo.org edited the summary of this revision. (Show Details)Mar 31 2026, 7:46 AM

monwarez_mailoo.org added a child revision: D56179: emulators/wine-devel: disable some asm inline.Mar 31 2026, 7:57 AM

monwarez_mailoo.org removed a child revision: D56179: emulators/wine-devel: disable some asm inline.Apr 19 2026, 5:36 PM

This is the final working version for new wow64

pi changed the edit policy from "Administrators" to "committers (Project)".May 9 2026, 4:51 AM

pi added subscribers: iwtcex_gmail.com, gerald.

monwarez_mailoo.org edited the summary of this revision. (Show Details)May 9 2026, 5:24 PM

I am very happy and very supportive of this change and believe it can go
in soon – hopefully getting key FreeBSD-specific changes upstream (or at
least submitted upstream).

My recommendation is to focus on getting dlls/ntdll/unix/signal_x86_64.c
upstream and at least submitting the configure.ac changes. Then I'd feel
comfortable approving this patchset (presumably for Wine 11.8 then)?

emulators/wine-devel/files/patch-configure.ac
2	Could this go upstream independently? Not to hold off this overall changset, it just seems important not to carry something like this locally, so at least seeing it submitted upstream seems important.
emulators/wine-devel/files/patch-dlls_ntdll_unix_signal__x86__64.c
3	This file is currently (for about a week) broken upstream after changes by Alexandre that only work on Linux and macOS. My strong recommendation is to focus on this, get it upstream (so that no local patch to this file is required) and then make the switch. Carrying a local patch of this complexity and size looks like a big maintenance risk.

This revision now requires changes to proceed.May 10 2026, 11:03 AM

dan.kotowski_a9development.com added a subscriber: dan.kotowski_a9development.com.May 11 2026, 6:14 PM

Alexander88207_protonmail.com added a subscriber: Alexander88207_protonmail.com.May 18 2026, 7:24 PM

monwarez_mailoo.org added inline comments.May 30 2026, 10:22 AM

emulators/wine-devel/files/patch-dlls_ntdll_unix_signal__x86__64.c
3	For this file, it is the one already upstream that is broken. So even if it is upstream, there is no guarantee that nothing will break. Unless upstream integrate FreeBSD into their CI, the only change there is to having the patch upstream is that the patch won't need to be rebased each times this files is changed. But that won't prevent things to break over time as we can see with the recent update. Sure it is a big maintenance risk, but having it upstream won't lift it.