deskutils/fet: update to 6.18.1

[uzsolt]

Summary

Simple update to 6.17.0.

Testport is fine on 13.2 and 14.0 too (qt5 and qt6 flavors too).
Portfmt, portclippy and portlint checks are ok.

[uzsolt]

In same days will be released a new version: https://lalescu.ro/liviu/fet/forum/index.php?topic=5840.msg32213#msg32213
Waiting for it.

[uzsolt]

Update to 6.17.0

[diizzy]

Try to look at logs more carefully, -std=gnu++1z is defined during build

[uzsolt]

In D43759#1003618, @diizzy wrote:

Try to look at logs more carefully, -std=gnu++1z is defined during build

Thanks.
What should I add to compiler USES?
I found on https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/C-Dialect-Options.html :

‘gnu++17’
‘gnu++1z’

GNU dialect of -std=c++17. This is the default for C++ code. The name ‘gnu++1z’ is deprecated.

Is the c++17-lang option is enough? I see in Mk/Uses/compiler.mk the gnu++17 in a for loop (https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/tree/Mk/Uses/compiler.mk#n139) and sets the OUTPUT_gnu++17 to yes if the CC accepts. Should I check this value?

[diizzy]

Hi,

Adding c++17-lang will be "good enough"

Best regards,
Daniel

[uzsolt]

Fix compiler standard.
New release: 6.18.0

Poudriere testport on amd64 13.2, 14.0 are ok (both qt5 and qt6). Portfmt, portclippy, portlint are ok.

Only one note: on flavor qt6 I see a warning message:
Warning: you might not need LIB_DEPENDS on libGL.so
But on flavor qt5 this message doesn't appear.

[bofh]

In D43759#1004964, @uzsolt wrote:

Only one note: on flavor qt6 I see a warning message:
Warning: you might not need LIB_DEPENDS on libGL.so
But on flavor qt5 this message doesn't appear.

poudriere's LIB checking is not too good. Sometimes it gives these sort of errors/warnings. If in doubts run the poudriere testport with -i which will give you an interactive jail after the test finishes. Recheck with ldd whether if the library is linked or not.

[uzsolt]

Update to 6.18.1.
Portlint, portclippy, portfmt are ok.
Poudriere testport passed on amd64 13.2 and 14.0, both qt5 and qt6 flavors.

Sorry I didn't notice the accept flag only now. This review is in "Waiting on Review" (not "Ready to Review").

[bofh]