User Details
- User Since
- Feb 4 2016, 4:45 PM (431 w, 3 d)
Sat, May 11
Fri, May 10
Fix computation of jitter.
Thu, May 9
Wed, May 8
Tue, May 7
Mon, May 6
Fri, May 3
I'm wondering if it would be better to require that the sack block covers at least mss - 40. We don't know if we sent a SACK or AccECN option and it doesn't make sense to ignore the SACK blocks corresponding to such packets we sent not performing an attack.
Thu, May 2
Wed, May 1
Thu, Apr 25
Wed, Apr 24
Sun, Apr 21
The decision is to keep BBR. See https://wiki.freebsd.org/TransportProtocols/18April2024.
Fri, Apr 19
Committed in c9cd686bd4a0.
Thu, Apr 18
Wed, Apr 17
Mon, Apr 15
Remove initialisation, which is not needed anymore.
Same fix for the BBR stack.
Apr 12 2024
Apr 11 2024
Apr 10 2024
I tested this patch on a BE system, the hints file is written in LE and can be used without problems.
I personally would commit the optimization (where there is not functional change intended) separately
from the change of the byte ordering of the hints file.
I'll test the patch on a BE system and report back.