Index: head/sys/kern/subr_smr.c =================================================================== --- head/sys/kern/subr_smr.c (revision 357640) +++ head/sys/kern/subr_smr.c (revision 357641) @@ -1,457 +1,463 @@ /*- * SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-FreeBSD * * Copyright (c) 2019,2020 Jeffrey Roberson * * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions * are met: * 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright * notice unmodified, this list of conditions, and the following * disclaimer. * 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright * notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the * documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution. * * THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE AUTHOR ``AS IS'' AND ANY EXPRESS OR * IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES * OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. * IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, * INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT * NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, * DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY * THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT * (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF * THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. */ #include __FBSDID("$FreeBSD$"); #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include /* * This is a novel safe memory reclamation technique inspired by * epoch based reclamation from Samy Al Bahra's concurrency kit which * in turn was based on work described in: * Fraser, K. 2004. Practical Lock-Freedom. PhD Thesis, University * of Cambridge Computing Laboratory. * And shares some similarities with: * Wang, Stamler, Parmer. 2016 Parallel Sections: Scaling System-Level * Data-Structures * * This is not an implementation of hazard pointers or related * techniques. The term safe memory reclamation is used as a * generic descriptor for algorithms that defer frees to avoid * use-after-free errors with lockless datastructures. * * The basic approach is to maintain a monotonic write sequence * number that is updated on some application defined granularity. * Readers record the most recent write sequence number they have * observed. A shared read sequence number records the lowest * sequence number observed by any reader as of the last poll. Any * write older than this value has been observed by all readers * and memory can be reclaimed. Like Epoch we also detect idle * readers by storing an invalid sequence number in the per-cpu * state when the read section exits. Like Parsec we establish * a global write clock that is used to mark memory on free. * * The write and read sequence numbers can be thought of as a two * handed clock with readers always advancing towards writers. SMR * maintains the invariant that all readers can safely access memory * that was visible at the time they loaded their copy of the sequence * number. Periodically the read sequence or hand is polled and * advanced as far towards the write sequence as active readers allow. * Memory which was freed between the old and new global read sequence * number can now be reclaimed. When the system is idle the two hands * meet and no deferred memory is outstanding. Readers never advance * any sequence number, they only observe them. The shared read * sequence number is consequently never higher than the write sequence. * A stored sequence number that falls outside of this range has expired * and needs no scan to reclaim. * * A notable distinction between this SMR and Epoch, qsbr, rcu, etc. is * that advancing the sequence number is decoupled from detecting its * observation. This results in a more granular assignment of sequence * numbers even as read latencies prohibit all or some expiration. * It also allows writers to advance the sequence number and save the * poll for expiration until a later time when it is likely to * complete without waiting. The batch granularity and free-to-use * latency is dynamic and can be significantly smaller than in more * strict systems. * * This mechanism is primarily intended to be used in coordination with * UMA. By integrating with the allocator we avoid all of the callout * queue machinery and are provided with an efficient way to batch * sequence advancement and waiting. The allocator accumulates a full * per-cpu cache of memory before advancing the sequence. It then * delays waiting for this sequence to expire until the memory is * selected for reuse. In this way we only increment the sequence * value once for n=cache-size frees and the waits are done long * after the sequence has been expired so they need only be verified * to account for pathological conditions and to advance the read * sequence. Tying the sequence number to the bucket size has the * nice property that as the zone gets busier the buckets get larger * and the sequence writes become fewer. If the coherency of advancing * the write sequence number becomes too costly we can advance * it for every N buckets in exchange for higher free-to-use * latency and consequently higher memory consumption. * * If the read overhead of accessing the shared cacheline becomes * especially burdensome an invariant TSC could be used in place of the * sequence. The algorithm would then only need to maintain the minimum * observed tsc. This would trade potential cache synchronization * overhead for local serialization and cpu timestamp overhead. */ /* * A simplified diagram: * * 0 UINT_MAX * | -------------------- sequence number space -------------------- | * ^ rd seq ^ wr seq * | ----- valid sequence numbers ---- | * ^cpuA ^cpuC * | -- free -- | --------- deferred frees -------- | ---- free ---- | * * * In this example cpuA has the lowest sequence number and poll can * advance rd seq. cpuB is not running and is considered to observe * wr seq. * * Freed memory that is tagged with a sequence number between rd seq and * wr seq can not be safely reclaimed because cpuA may hold a reference to * it. Any other memory is guaranteed to be unreferenced. * * Any writer is free to advance wr seq at any time however it may busy * poll in pathological cases. */ static uma_zone_t smr_shared_zone; static uma_zone_t smr_zone; #ifndef INVARIANTS #define SMR_SEQ_INIT 1 /* All valid sequence numbers are odd. */ #define SMR_SEQ_INCR 2 /* * SMR_SEQ_MAX_DELTA is the maximum distance allowed between rd_seq and * wr_seq. For the modular arithmetic to work a value of UNIT_MAX / 2 * would be possible but it is checked after we increment the wr_seq so * a safety margin is left to prevent overflow. * * We will block until SMR_SEQ_MAX_ADVANCE sequence numbers have progressed * to prevent integer wrapping. See smr_advance() for more details. */ #define SMR_SEQ_MAX_DELTA (UINT_MAX / 4) #define SMR_SEQ_MAX_ADVANCE (SMR_SEQ_MAX_DELTA - 1024) #else /* We want to test the wrapping feature in invariants kernels. */ #define SMR_SEQ_INCR (UINT_MAX / 10000) #define SMR_SEQ_INIT (UINT_MAX - 100000) /* Force extra polls to test the integer overflow detection. */ -#define SMR_SEQ_MAX_DELTA (1000) +#define SMR_SEQ_MAX_DELTA (SMR_SEQ_INCR * 32) #define SMR_SEQ_MAX_ADVANCE SMR_SEQ_MAX_DELTA / 2 #endif static SYSCTL_NODE(_debug, OID_AUTO, smr, CTLFLAG_RW, NULL, "SMR Stats"); static counter_u64_t advance = EARLY_COUNTER; SYSCTL_COUNTER_U64(_debug_smr, OID_AUTO, advance, CTLFLAG_RD, &advance, ""); static counter_u64_t advance_wait = EARLY_COUNTER; SYSCTL_COUNTER_U64(_debug_smr, OID_AUTO, advance_wait, CTLFLAG_RD, &advance_wait, ""); static counter_u64_t poll = EARLY_COUNTER; SYSCTL_COUNTER_U64(_debug_smr, OID_AUTO, poll, CTLFLAG_RD, &poll, ""); static counter_u64_t poll_scan = EARLY_COUNTER; SYSCTL_COUNTER_U64(_debug_smr, OID_AUTO, poll_scan, CTLFLAG_RD, &poll_scan, ""); /* * Advance the write sequence and return the new value for use as the * wait goal. This guarantees that any changes made by the calling * thread prior to this call will be visible to all threads after * rd_seq meets or exceeds the return value. * * This function may busy loop if the readers are roughly 1 billion * sequence numbers behind the writers. */ smr_seq_t smr_advance(smr_t smr) { smr_shared_t s; - smr_seq_t goal; + smr_seq_t goal, s_rd_seq; /* * It is illegal to enter while in an smr section. */ KASSERT(curthread->td_critnest == 0, ("smr_advance: Not allowed in a critical section.")); /* * Modifications not done in a smr section need to be visible * before advancing the seq. */ atomic_thread_fence_rel(); /* + * Load the current read seq before incrementing the goal so + * we are guaranteed it is always < goal. + */ + s = zpcpu_get(smr)->c_shared; + s_rd_seq = atomic_load_acq_int(&s->s_rd_seq); + + /* * Increment the shared write sequence by 2. Since it is * initialized to 1 this means the only valid values are * odd and an observed value of 0 in a particular CPU means * it is not currently in a read section. */ - s = zpcpu_get(smr)->c_shared; goal = atomic_fetchadd_int(&s->s_wr_seq, SMR_SEQ_INCR) + SMR_SEQ_INCR; counter_u64_add(advance, 1); /* * Force a synchronization here if the goal is getting too * far ahead of the read sequence number. This keeps the * wrap detecting arithmetic working in pathological cases. */ - if (goal - atomic_load_int(&s->s_rd_seq) >= SMR_SEQ_MAX_DELTA) { + if (SMR_SEQ_DELTA(goal, s_rd_seq) >= SMR_SEQ_MAX_DELTA) { counter_u64_add(advance_wait, 1); smr_wait(smr, goal - SMR_SEQ_MAX_ADVANCE); } return (goal); } smr_seq_t smr_advance_deferred(smr_t smr, int limit) { smr_seq_t goal; smr_t csmr; critical_enter(); csmr = zpcpu_get(smr); if (++csmr->c_deferred >= limit) { goal = SMR_SEQ_INVALID; csmr->c_deferred = 0; } else goal = smr_shared_current(csmr->c_shared) + SMR_SEQ_INCR; critical_exit(); if (goal != SMR_SEQ_INVALID) return (goal); return (smr_advance(smr)); } /* * Poll to determine whether all readers have observed the 'goal' write * sequence number. * * If wait is true this will spin until the goal is met. * * This routine will updated the minimum observed read sequence number in * s_rd_seq if it does a scan. It may not do a scan if another call has * advanced s_rd_seq beyond the callers goal already. * * Returns true if the goal is met and false if not. */ bool smr_poll(smr_t smr, smr_seq_t goal, bool wait) { smr_shared_t s; smr_t c; smr_seq_t s_wr_seq, s_rd_seq, rd_seq, c_seq; int i; bool success; /* * It is illegal to enter while in an smr section. */ KASSERT(!wait || curthread->td_critnest == 0, ("smr_poll: Blocking not allowed in a critical section.")); /* * Use a critical section so that we can avoid ABA races * caused by long preemption sleeps. */ success = true; critical_enter(); s = zpcpu_get(smr)->c_shared; counter_u64_add_protected(poll, 1); /* * Acquire barrier loads s_wr_seq after s_rd_seq so that we can not * observe an updated read sequence that is larger than write. */ s_rd_seq = atomic_load_acq_int(&s->s_rd_seq); /* * wr_seq must be loaded prior to any c_seq value so that a stale * c_seq can only reference time after this wr_seq. */ s_wr_seq = atomic_load_acq_int(&s->s_wr_seq); /* * This may have come from a deferred advance. Consider one * increment past the current wr_seq valid and make sure we * have advanced far enough to succeed. We simply add to avoid * an additional fence. */ if (goal == s_wr_seq + SMR_SEQ_INCR) { atomic_add_int(&s->s_wr_seq, SMR_SEQ_INCR); s_wr_seq = goal; } /* * Detect whether the goal is valid and has already been observed. * * The goal must be in the range of s_wr_seq >= goal >= s_rd_seq for * it to be valid. If it is not then the caller held on to it and * the integer wrapped. If we wrapped back within range the caller * will harmlessly scan. * * A valid goal must be greater than s_rd_seq or we have not verified * that it has been observed and must fall through to polling. */ if (SMR_SEQ_GEQ(s_rd_seq, goal) || SMR_SEQ_LT(s_wr_seq, goal)) goto out; /* * Loop until all cores have observed the goal sequence or have * gone inactive. Keep track of the oldest sequence currently * active as rd_seq. */ counter_u64_add_protected(poll_scan, 1); rd_seq = s_wr_seq; CPU_FOREACH(i) { c = zpcpu_get_cpu(smr, i); c_seq = SMR_SEQ_INVALID; for (;;) { c_seq = atomic_load_int(&c->c_seq); if (c_seq == SMR_SEQ_INVALID) break; /* * There is a race described in smr.h:smr_enter that * can lead to a stale seq value but not stale data * access. If we find a value out of range here we * pin it to the current min to prevent it from * advancing until that stale section has expired. * * The race is created when a cpu loads the s_wr_seq * value in a local register and then another thread * advances s_wr_seq and calls smr_poll() which will * oberve no value yet in c_seq and advance s_rd_seq * up to s_wr_seq which is beyond the register * cached value. This is only likely to happen on * hypervisor or with a system management interrupt. */ if (SMR_SEQ_LT(c_seq, s_rd_seq)) c_seq = s_rd_seq; /* * If the sequence number meets the goal we are * done with this cpu. */ if (SMR_SEQ_GEQ(c_seq, goal)) break; /* * If we're not waiting we will still scan the rest * of the cpus and update s_rd_seq before returning * an error. */ if (!wait) { success = false; break; } cpu_spinwait(); } /* * Limit the minimum observed rd_seq whether we met the goal * or not. */ if (c_seq != SMR_SEQ_INVALID && SMR_SEQ_GT(rd_seq, c_seq)) rd_seq = c_seq; } /* * Advance the rd_seq as long as we observed the most recent one. */ s_rd_seq = atomic_load_int(&s->s_rd_seq); do { if (SMR_SEQ_LEQ(rd_seq, s_rd_seq)) goto out; } while (atomic_fcmpset_int(&s->s_rd_seq, &s_rd_seq, rd_seq) == 0); out: critical_exit(); /* * Serialize with smr_advance()/smr_exit(). The caller is now free * to modify memory as expected. */ atomic_thread_fence_acq(); return (success); } smr_t smr_create(const char *name) { smr_t smr, c; smr_shared_t s; int i; s = uma_zalloc(smr_shared_zone, M_WAITOK); smr = uma_zalloc(smr_zone, M_WAITOK); s->s_name = name; s->s_rd_seq = s->s_wr_seq = SMR_SEQ_INIT; /* Initialize all CPUS, not just those running. */ for (i = 0; i <= mp_maxid; i++) { c = zpcpu_get_cpu(smr, i); c->c_seq = SMR_SEQ_INVALID; c->c_shared = s; } atomic_thread_fence_seq_cst(); return (smr); } void smr_destroy(smr_t smr) { smr_synchronize(smr); uma_zfree(smr_shared_zone, smr->c_shared); uma_zfree(smr_zone, smr); } /* * Initialize the UMA slab zone. */ void smr_init(void) { smr_shared_zone = uma_zcreate("SMR SHARED", sizeof(struct smr_shared), NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, (CACHE_LINE_SIZE * 2) - 1, 0); smr_zone = uma_zcreate("SMR CPU", sizeof(struct smr), NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, (CACHE_LINE_SIZE * 2) - 1, UMA_ZONE_PCPU); } static void smr_init_counters(void *unused) { advance = counter_u64_alloc(M_WAITOK); advance_wait = counter_u64_alloc(M_WAITOK); poll = counter_u64_alloc(M_WAITOK); poll_scan = counter_u64_alloc(M_WAITOK); } SYSINIT(smr_counters, SI_SUB_CPU, SI_ORDER_ANY, smr_init_counters, NULL);