Index: head/audio/lame/Makefile
===================================================================
--- head/audio/lame/Makefile	(revision 475449)
+++ head/audio/lame/Makefile	(revision 475450)
@@ -1,56 +1,58 @@
 # Created by: yoshiaki Uchikawa
 # $FreeBSD$
 
 PORTNAME=	lame
 PORTVERSION=	3.100
+PORTREVISION=	1
 CATEGORIES=	audio
 MASTER_SITES=	SF/${PORTNAME:tl}/${PORTNAME:tl}/3.100
 
 MAINTAINER=	netchild@FreeBSD.org
 COMMENT=	Fast MP3 encoder kit
 
-LICENSE=	LGPL20+
-LICENSE_FILE=	${WRKSRC}/COPYING
+LICENSE=		LGPL20+ PATENTS
+LICENSE_COMB=		multi
+LICENSE_FILE_LGPL20=	${WRKSRC}/COPYING
+LICENSE_NAME_PATENTS=	Intellectual Property Precaution
+LICENSE_PERMS_PATENTS=	dist-mirror dist-sell no-pkg-mirror no-pkg-sell auto-accept
+LICENSE_TEXT_PATENTS=	http://www.mp3licensing.com/ only talks about the FhG and Technicolor patent portfolio \
+			but there are also portfolios from Sisvel (from Philips) and \
+			Nokia (from AT&T -> Lucent -> Alcatel). \
+			Some "old" patents are now expired, but there are more recent MP3 patents. Some \
+			of the more recent ones are multi-channel related, which is not implemented in LAME. \
+			There was no investigation (in the LAME project) about which patent exists, which \
+			one is implemented in LAME, and which one is not (yet) expired. As such it is not \
+			known if LAME could now be distributed as a binary package or not. \
+			Linux distributions seem to go the "let's see if get sued" way, FreeBSD does not \
+			follow this.
 
 USES=		gmake iconv libtool
 USE_LDCONFIG=	yes
 GNU_CONFIGURE=	yes
 CONFIGURE_ARGS=	--enable-nasm --enable-mp3rtp --disable-gtktest
-
-RESTRICTED=	patent issues
-# http://www.mp3licensing.com/ only talks about the FhG and Technicolor patent portfolio
-# but there are also portfolios from Sisvel (from Philips) and
-# Nokia (from AT&T -> Lucent -> Alcatel).
-# Some "old" patents are now expired, but there are more recent MP3 patents. Some
-# of the more recent ones are multi-channel related, which is not implemented in LAME.
-# There was no investigation (in the LAME project) about which patent exists, which
-# one is implemented in LAME, and which one is not (yet) expired. As such it is not
-# known if LAME could now be distributed as a binary package or not.
-# Linux distributions seem to go the "let's see if get sued" way, FreeBSD doesn't
-# follow this.
 
 DOC_FILES=	API LICENSE README TODO USAGE
 
 OPTIONS_DEFINE=	DOCS
 
 .include <bsd.port.pre.mk>
 
 .if ${ARCH} == "i386"
 BUILD_DEPENDS+=	nasm:devel/nasm
 .endif
 
 post-patch:
 # Fix parallel builds
 	@${REINPLACE_CMD} -e 's,test -d \.libs || mkdir,mkdir -p,' \
 		${WRKSRC}/libmp3lame/i386/Makefile.in
 
 post-install:
 	${STRIP_CMD} ${STAGEDIR}${PREFIX}/lib/libmp3lame.so.0
 
 post-install-DOCS-on:
 	@${MKDIR} ${STAGEDIR}${DOCSDIR}
 .for file in ${DOC_FILES}
 	${INSTALL_DATA} ${WRKSRC}/${file} ${STAGEDIR}${DOCSDIR}
 .endfor
 
 .include <bsd.port.post.mk>