- User Since
- Aug 7 2018, 4:04 AM (27 w, 4 d)
Sep 25 2018
I want to stop this patch. I can not find any way to make it trigger. I feel that this condition was added to openbsd only to deal with a potential edge case . I can not find any way to make it trigger.
Aug 30 2018
After reviewing the original OpenBSD version and talking to one of the authors of the change . I better understand what is going on here.
Aug 10 2018
This diff removed the extraneous comments and simplified the flowid assignment with use of M_HASHTYPE_OPAQUE_HASH
Aug 7 2018
The 10-STABLE series of mbuf.h does not define a M_HASHTYPE_OPAQUE_HASH just a M_HASHTYPE_OPAQUE . Should I change the patch to work with 10 and make a new for 11 and on where opaque_hash exists ?
Here is a patch updated for the comments above that uses M_HASHTYPE_OPAQUE in place of M_HASHTYPE_OPAQUE_HASH ?
Kristof , I am going to retest using the simplified patch. Do I need to resubmit it in this form ?