User Details
User Details
- User Since
- Aug 15 2024, 3:23 PM (26 w, 2 d)
Dec 21 2024
Dec 21 2024
mail_fbsd2.e4m.org added a comment to D48154: devd.conf(5): explain internal vs. shell variables.
The asterisk and the minus sign form special variables.
Dec 20 2024
Dec 20 2024
mail_fbsd2.e4m.org added a comment to D48154: devd.conf(5): explain internal vs. shell variables.
Fine with me, but please check my comments.
Aug 26 2024
Aug 26 2024
mail_fbsd2.e4m.org added a comment to D46313: daemon(8): Add option to write pidfile w/o supervising it.
So how shall we proceed with this? While I am not happy with the --no-supervise idea (because of
the confusion it might produce) I could make a patch which
Aug 17 2024
Aug 17 2024
mail_fbsd2.e4m.org added a comment to D46313: daemon(8): Add option to write pidfile w/o supervising it.
Hmm, what will happen if one uses --no-supervise (with or even w/o -p) but has given other
options which need supervising? Should we silently ignore --no-supervise? Or spit out a
warning or even an error?
Not thinking about the code which has to honour --no-supervise when finished parsing all
options and then has to decide what to do...