- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
Advanced Search
Nov 1 2015
Oct 20 2015
Oct 19 2015
Oct 18 2015
Oct 15 2015
Aug 20 2015
Aug 6 2015
Aug 4 2015
Aug 3 2015
May 15 2015
Apr 30 2015
Fix grammar in man page.
Migrate to latest revision.
Feb 6 2015
I sort of was thinking the 'record-state' command would do nothing except record state.
in other words it would have an impicit "don't do it now", and it would not have an implicit check-state.
It was my first intention because it solves task I had at hands. But after that I've started to explain idea to somebody at ipfw@ list and found that my first approach is not much better than current one, because main problem is this "implicit".
Feb 5 2015
New diff with spelling mistakes fixed. Thanks, Julian!
while the 'skip-immediate' is useful, I was thinking that record-state would imply that.
skip immediate is only useful with state storage, so I don't see a reason to make it generally available.
And same argument in other word: we remove one implicit effect of keep-state and limit (checking of state) and add another one (skipping of action)!
while the 'skip-immediate' is useful, I was thinking that record-state would imply that.
It was first idea. But after some thoughts, I decided, that it is not good enough.