Changeset View
Changeset View
Standalone View
Standalone View
usr.bin/netstat/inet6.c
Show First 20 Lines • Show All 1,029 Lines • ▼ Show 20 Lines | #undef NELEM | ||||
p_5(icp6s_otime_exceed_reassembly, "\t\t{:time-exceed-reassembly/%ju} " | p_5(icp6s_otime_exceed_reassembly, "\t\t{:time-exceed-reassembly/%ju} " | ||||
"{N:/time exceed reassembly}\n"); | "{N:/time exceed reassembly}\n"); | ||||
p_5(icp6s_oparamprob_header, "\t\t{:bad-header/%ju} " | p_5(icp6s_oparamprob_header, "\t\t{:bad-header/%ju} " | ||||
"{N:/erroneous header field}\n"); | "{N:/erroneous header field}\n"); | ||||
p_5(icp6s_oparamprob_nextheader, "\t\t{:bad-next-header/%ju} " | p_5(icp6s_oparamprob_nextheader, "\t\t{:bad-next-header/%ju} " | ||||
"{N:/unrecognized next header}\n"); | "{N:/unrecognized next header}\n"); | ||||
p_5(icp6s_oparamprob_option, "\t\t{:bad-option/%ju} " | p_5(icp6s_oparamprob_option, "\t\t{:bad-option/%ju} " | ||||
"{N:/unrecognized option}\n"); | "{N:/unrecognized option}\n"); | ||||
p_5(icp6s_oparamprob_fraghdrchain, "\t\t{:bad-header-chain/%ju} " | |||||
"{N:/incomplete upper layer first fragment}\n"); | |||||
bz: Not sure I'd call it bad header chain, given this is something more specific. It really means… | |||||
p_5(icp6s_oredirect, "\t\t{:redirects/%ju} " | p_5(icp6s_oredirect, "\t\t{:redirects/%ju} " | ||||
"{N:/redirect}\n"); | "{N:/redirect}\n"); | ||||
p_5(icp6s_ounknown, "\t\t{:unknown/%ju} {N:unknown}\n"); | p_5(icp6s_ounknown, "\t\t{:unknown/%ju} {N:unknown}\n"); | ||||
p(icp6s_reflect, "\t{:reflect/%ju} " | p(icp6s_reflect, "\t{:reflect/%ju} " | ||||
"{N:/message response%s generated}\n"); | "{N:/message response%s generated}\n"); | ||||
p(icp6s_nd_toomanyopt, "\t{:too-many-nd-options/%ju} " | p(icp6s_nd_toomanyopt, "\t{:too-many-nd-options/%ju} " | ||||
"{N:/message%s with too many ND options}\n"); | "{N:/message%s with too many ND options}\n"); | ||||
▲ Show 20 Lines • Show All 311 Lines • Show Last 20 Lines |
Not sure I'd call it bad header chain, given this is something more specific. It really means no-ulp-in-first-frag, right? frag1-no-ulp? or simply bad-frag-hdr-chain? I think it is essential that this is related to the first fragment.
no or incomplete upper layer header in first fragment << that too long a line?