Differential D16719 Diff 46699 sys/x86/include/x86_var.h

Changeset View

Standalone View

sys/x86/include/x86_var.h

	Show First 20 Lines • Show All 92 Lines • ▼ Show 20 Lines
	void nmi_call_kdb_smp(u_int type, struct trapframe *frame);	void nmi_call_kdb_smp(u_int type, struct trapframe *frame);
	void nmi_handle_intr(u_int type, struct trapframe *frame);	void nmi_handle_intr(u_int type, struct trapframe *frame);
	void pagecopy(void from, void to);	void pagecopy(void from, void to);
	void printcpuinfo(void);	void printcpuinfo(void);
	int pti_get_default(void);	int pti_get_default(void);
	int user_dbreg_trap(register_t dr6);	int user_dbreg_trap(register_t dr6);
	int minidumpsys(struct dumperinfo *);	int minidumpsys(struct dumperinfo *);
	struct pcb get_pcb_td(struct thread td);	struct pcb get_pcb_td(struct thread td);
		void phys_avail_reserve(vm_paddr_t start, vm_paddr_t end);
		impUnsubmitted Not Done Inline Actions Is this a MI interface we want all our MD code to use to cope with similar issues that we're currently coping with in other, ad-hoc ways? imp: Is this a MI interface we want all our MD code to use to cope with similar issues that we're…
		kibUnsubmitted Not Done Inline Actions I believe this is highly MD code and interface. Early manipulations with phys_avail[] cannot be anything else. kib: I believe this is highly MD code and interface. Early manipulations with phys_avail[] cannot…
		johalun0_gmail.comAuthorUnsubmitted Not Done Inline Actions Yes. The question is, do we want this function for 32bit as well (I left this open for discussion)? For graphics I can't think of a future we're will need it for i386. If we keep it amd64 only, what would be the correct header for it? johalun0_gmail.com: Yes. The question is, do we want this function for 32bit as well (I left this open for…
		kibUnsubmitted Not Done Inline Actions We have amd64/include/md_var.h and i386/include/md_var.h. x86_var.h is just a common extract. But I do not see why i386 should be excluded. kib: We have amd64/include/md_var.h and i386/include/md_var.h. x86_var.h is just a common extract.
		johalun0_gmail.comAuthorUnsubmitted Not Done Inline Actions Is there a common source file for i386/amd64 that make sense to put phys_avail() in (since the implementations would be the same) or should we duplicate it in machdep.c? johalun0_gmail.com: Is there a common source file for i386/amd64 that make sense to put phys_avail() in (since the…
		kibUnsubmitted Not Done Inline Actions I believe a new source file in x86/x86 is the best. kib: I believe a new source file in x86/x86 is the best.

	#endif	#endif
Context not available.