Changeset View
Standalone View
devel/py-apptools/Makefile
Property | Old Value | New Value |
---|---|---|
svn:eol-style | null | native \ No newline at end of property |
svn:keywords | null | FreeBSD=%H \ No newline at end of property |
svn:mime-type | null | text/plain \ No newline at end of property |
# Created by: Vladimir Chukharev | |||||
# $FreeBSD$ | |||||
PORTNAME= apptools | |||||
PORTVERSION= 4.3.0 | |||||
CATEGORIES= devel python | |||||
MASTER_SITES= CHEESESHOP | |||||
PKGNAMEPREFIX= ${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX} | |||||
MAINTAINER= Vladimir.Chukharev@gmail.com | |||||
COMMENT= Enthought application tools | |||||
koobs: Rule of thumb:
* Use the setup.py:description= field for COMMENT, making changes to satisfy… | |||||
LICENSE= BSD3CLAUSE | |||||
Done Inline ActionsLICENSE.txt exists in WRKSRC, so add LICENSE_FILE I can also see an image_LICENSE.txt file. If multiple LICENSES are declared, use LICENSE_COMB (See Mk/bsd.licenses.mk for details) koobs: LICENSE.txt exists in WRKSRC, so add LICENSE_FILE
I can also see an image_LICENSE.txt file. | |||||
LICENSE_FILE= ${WRKSRC}/LICENSE.txt | |||||
Done Inline ActionsThis particular port uses one license, 'Done' is about this port only. I'm not sure in correctness of the declarations made. Awaiting for additions by A.J. "Fonz" van Werven to Porter's Handbook, see topic 'License info Q' in ports maillist: https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2015-November/101198.html Vladimir.Chukharev_gmail.com: This particular port uses one license, 'Done' is about this port only.
Others do use more than… | |||||
# See ${WRKSRC}/image_LICENSE.txt for information that other | |||||
# files *LICENSE* are not used | |||||
RUN_DEPENDS= ${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX}traits>=4.5.0:${PORTSDIR}/devel/py-traits \ | |||||
${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX}configobj>=5.0.:${PORTSDIR}/devel/py-configobj | |||||
USES= python:-2.7 | |||||
Done Inline ActionsNot necessary, this is the default. koobs: Not necessary, this is the default. | |||||
USE_PYTHON= autoplist distutils | |||||
NO_ARCH= yes | |||||
Done Inline ActionsWhy NO_BUILD? koobs: Why NO_BUILD? | |||||
.include <bsd.port.mk> |
Rule of thumb:
Currently, upstream has this as the description
I would temporarily use:
And submit an upstream issue for them to modify the description= to something better/more descriptive (< 72 chars)