[NEW PORT] devel/oniguruma6: Oniguruma library version 6

[lifanov]

Summary

• new port: devel/oniguruma

Oniguruma is a regular expressions library. The characteristics of this
library is that different character encoding for every regular
expression object can be specified.

PR: 212715
Submitted by: Yuri Victorovich <[e-mail]>, Robert Zelaya <[e-mail]> (original version)
Reviewed by: matthew, mat
Approved by: matthew (mentor)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D8871

Test Plan

poudriere testport : OK
portlint -a : OK

[lifanov]

rename to devel/onigurama, set Yuri as maintainer

[lifanov]

Whoops, apparently arc scoops stuff up from parent directories too...

[lifanov]

poudriere testport is good

[matthew]

devel/Makefile

1710

You should explain why you're changing the existing naming convention in the summary -- and the summary should form the body of your commit message.

devel/oniguruma/Makefile

9

As [e-mail] is the maintainer of the other two oniguruma ports and the originator of the PR to create this port, please make sure he agrees with handing over maintainership for this port.

10

Why have you dropped DIST_SUBDIR here?

14–15

Is this CONFLICTS setting correct? Given that the only versions in ports are oniguruma-4, -5 and this -6 probably not.

If possible, can you use CONFLICTS_INSTALL rather than CONFLICTS ? That requires that you can build this port when one of the conflicting ports is already installed. If building like that breaks, then just carry on using plain CONFLICTS.

devel/oniguruma/pkg-descr

4–5

While attributing bits of work to their authors is generally a good thing, it's not what pkg-descr is for. This sort of thing can be included in the package documentation.

7

You don't want to talk about change history / version dependent stuff in pkg-descr: this file is purely to tell the users *what* this port is, and the text should be independent of the precise version of the software.

14

Similarly, you don't want to put this license stuff into pkg-descr -- it's already in the port Makefile.

portlint will moan at you if pkg-descr is too long -- that's more a guideline than a rigidly enforced rule though.

[matthew]

Builds fine.

As noted, the CONFLICTS setting looks non-sensical. That will need fixing in all of the devel/oniguruma* ports, not just this new port. You can fix that sort of ports infrastructure thing without asking the maintainer, but as you should be contacting him anyhow, it might be an idea to mention what you're going to do. (Some maintainers can get pretty possessive of *their* ports, but a little diplomacy goes a long way.)

The pkg-descr needs trimming down as indicated. For new ports, running 'portlint -a' is mandatory (even if they were copied from another port).

My other comments are on things you'll need to justify in your commit message. That's ideally a brief outline of what you changed and -- most importantly -- why.

The 'Summary' section in a review should contain pretty much the same stuff as you'ld put in the commit message

[mat]

devel/Makefile

1710

It should be added as oniguruma6, like the others.

[lifanov]

devel/oniguruma/Makefile

9

I am trying my best go get in touch with him.

10

This isn't a ruby thing. It's a C library written in C and it's used by other projects, like PHP, jq, and mosh to name a few.

14–15

CONFLICTS setting is not correct. I'll fix it

[lifanov]

devel/Makefile

1710

The volunteer maintainer for the new port (Yuri) would prefer it this way. If I hear from Robert, I will keep it oniguruma6. There are other examples in the ports tree with the bare and versioned ports.

[lifanov]

address feedback by matthew

[mat]

devel/Makefile

1710

The original submitter put it there.

Also, the porter's handbook says that:

We reserve the right to modify the maintainer's submission to better match existing policies and style of the Ports Collection without explicit blessing from the submitter or the maintainer.

Put it in a versioned directory, it is the current trend for the ports tree :-)

Also, don't forget to add PKGNAMESUFFIX=6.

devel/oniguruma/Makefile

9

I agree with matthew here, keep the original MAINTAINER.

20

The conflict is wrong, there are no ports named oniguruma-[45].*, there are, on the other hand, ports named oniguruma4-* or oniguruma5-*.

[lifanov]

reinstate PKGNAMESUFFIX

[lifanov]

whoops, fix CONFLICTS_INSTALLED as suggested by mat

[lifanov]

reinstate maintainer from original submission

[matthew]

This looks good to me.

[matthew]

Also, don't forget to fix the CONFLICTS in devel/oniguruma4 and devel/oniguruma5.

[lifanov]

Hi matthew, I haven't been able to get in touch with Robert. Can I just submit a review and do it?

[matthew]

Updating CONFLICTS? Yes. Go for it.