The SO_REUSEPORT_LB isn't a standard option, neither ENOMEM is a specified
return code from bind(2), but it definitely is more appropriate than
EAGAIN or the masked ENOBUFS.
Details
Details
Diff Detail
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rG FreeBSD src repository
- Lint
Lint Skipped - Unit
Tests Skipped - Build Status
Buildable 62657 Build 59541: arc lint + arc unit
Event Timeline
sys/netinet/in_pcb.c | ||
---|---|---|
736 | What's the purpose of this assertion? If you want to document that in_pcbinshash() can only fail for lbgroup sockets, IMO it would be better to somehow document that fact in in_pcbinshash(). |