diff --git a/sys/compat/linuxkpi/common/include/linux/seqlock.h b/sys/compat/linuxkpi/common/include/linux/seqlock.h --- a/sys/compat/linuxkpi/common/include/linux/seqlock.h +++ b/sys/compat/linuxkpi/common/include/linux/seqlock.h @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ #include #include +#include #include #include #include @@ -84,9 +85,24 @@ struct seqcount_mutex: seqc_write_end \ )(&(s)->seqc) +static inline void +lkpi_write_seqcount_invalidate(seqc_t *seqcp) +{ + atomic_thread_fence_rel(); + *seqcp += SEQC_MOD * 2; +} +#define write_seqcount_invalidate(s) lkpi_write_seqcount_invalidate(&(s)->seqc) + #define read_seqcount_begin(s) seqc_read(&(s)->seqc) #define raw_read_seqcount(s) seqc_read_any(&(s)->seqc) +static inline seqc_t +lkpi_seqprop_sequence(const seqc_t *seqcp) +{ + return (atomic_load_int(__DECONST(seqc_t *, seqcp))); +} +#define seqprop_sequence(s) lkpi_seqprop_sequence(&(s)->seqc) + /* * XXX: Are predicts from inline functions still not honored by clang? */