Show that 13.2 is the preferred release and 12.4/13.1 are legacy

[brd]

Test Plan

Build local website copy

[brd]

This is the result of this change:

{F61450441}

[bcr]

@carlavilla: Does that look correct to you?

[carlavilla]

Sorry, forgot about that, I'll take a look tomorrow. But looks good.

[carlavilla]

Sorry, forgot about that, I'll take a look tomorrow. But looks good

[carlavilla]

Before moving this, can I have the approval from @releng?

[cperciva]

Not commenting on the HTML, but I approve the designation of 13.2 as production and 12.4/13.1 as legacy.

[grahamperrin]

Re: https://www.freebsd.org/security/#sup if there's no correlation between end of life and legacy, then for partial consistency there should be an update to the sidebar(s) where 12.4 and 13.2 are production releases.

[fernape]

In D40164#934195, @cperciva wrote:

Not commenting on the HTML, but I approve the designation of 13.2 as production and 12.4/13.1 as legacy.

Why is 12.4 legacy? Is is expected to be EOL'ed in December 31, 2023.
At any point in time, don't we generally have two major branches plus current?
In that case we usually mark the highest point release in every branch as "production". In this case that would be 13.2 and 12.4 Production.
What's the rationale here?

In D40164#934195, @cperciva wrote:

Not commenting on the HTML, but I approve the designation of 13.2 as production and 12.4/13.1 as legacy.