Details
- Reviewers
gjb debdrup - Commits
- R9:a88e73dd3566: Add routing work description
Diff Detail
- Repository
- R9 FreeBSD doc repository
- Lint
No Lint Coverage - Unit
No Test Coverage - Build Status
Buildable 37853 Build 34742: arc lint + arc unit
Event Timeline
| website/content/en/releases/13.0R/relnotes.adoc | ||
|---|---|---|
| 255 | Q: what is the proper way to reference the person who contributed this change? | |
I'm unsure about inlining commit hashes or revisions, so I think @gjb will have to weigh in on whether commit hashes should be referenced at the end like it's done with other things mentioned in the release notes.
I'm more partial to this, as this is how release notes have always looked, but I'm not against the change, as long as it's uniform across the whole document.
| website/content/en/releases/13.0R/relnotes.adoc | ||
|---|---|---|
| 222 | ||
| 224 | ||
| 225 | ||
| 227 | ||
| 241 | ||
| 242 | ||
| 243 | ||
| 245 | Is there a line too many here? | |
| 247 | ||
| 248 | ||
| 249 | ||
| 250 | ||
| 252 | ||
| 255 | The authorship is noted in that commit, so unless they explicitly asked to be mentioned in the release notes, I'm not sure. | |
| 255 | ||
Remove rev-named in favor of currently existing macro, as it's too late to change the rest of the release notes.
Only one tiny nit left, then you can go ahead and commit it with Approved by: debdrup
| website/content/en/releases/13.0R/relnotes.adoc | ||
|---|---|---|
| 266 | The colon should be a period. | |