Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

net-mgmt/netdata: Update to 1.18.1
AbandonedPublic

Authored by diizzy on Oct 10 2019, 1:22 PM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
F81627017: D21969.id63127.diff
Fri, Apr 19, 5:08 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Wed, Apr 10, 3:10 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Fri, Mar 29, 9:40 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Mar 3 2024, 3:47 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Jan 14 2024, 4:02 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Jan 13 2024, 7:58 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Dec 27 2023, 10:50 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Dec 27 2023, 10:50 PM
Subscribers

Details

Reviewers
mmokhi
Summary

Update netdata to 1.18.1
Add option for LTO (enabled by default in older versions)
Update configuration sample and remove irrelevant settings for initial setup

Test Plan

Compile and Runtime tested on AMD64, FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT r352230

Diff Detail

Repository
rP FreeBSD ports repository
Lint
Lint Skipped
Unit
Tests Skipped

Event Timeline

Remove USE_LDCONFIG
Refresh patches

Poudriere logs{F5549381}

Revert changes to files/patch-configure.ac

Upstream changed release tag

diizzy retitled this revision from net-mgmt/netdata: Update to 1.18.0 to net-mgmt/netdata: Update to 1.18.1.
diizzy edited the summary of this revision. (Show Details)

Update to 1.18.1

Hi there, i already have it here:

https://reviews.freebsd.org/D22045

We need to wait for maintainer (or timeout) to merge it.

Remove GH_ACCOUNT variable
Update pkg-descr with correct URL
These changes are taken from D22045 made by Alex Samorukov

Can we abandon this review in favor of the another one?

At least fix the issues reported in that case?

In D21969#483371, @daniel.engberg.lists_pyret.net wrote:

At least fix the issues reported in that case?

Sure, why not? My suggestion to abandon it here is to focus in a single place and you will receive the credits too for the changes. It will make easy the review as well as makes the maintainers life easier.

Sure, but I think it's a discouraging way to handle submissions in terms of chronological order.

In D21969#483377, @daniel.engberg.lists_pyret.net wrote:

Sure, but I think it's a discouraging way to handle submissions in terms of chronological order.

It is not my intention to discouraging you to keep submitting patches! Please, sync with @samm the changes you would like to see there and were not applied yet. You will get the credits for this update, no worries.