Details
- Reviewers
tobik - Group Reviewers
rust O5: Ports Framework (Owns No Changed Paths) portmgr - Commits
- rP490602: lang/rust: oops, don't default to pre-releases
rP490601: lang/rust: rename patches to match diff prefix
rP490600: lang/rust: update to 1.32.0
lang/rust:
consumers on 11.2 amd64:
- databases/puppetdb-cli
- devel/bingrep
- devel/pijul
- devel/racer
- devel/racerd
- devel/rust-bindgen
- devel/rust-cbindgen
- devel/sccache
- devel/tokei
- dns/doh-proxy
- editors/kak-lsp
- editors/xi-core
- games/genact
- graphics/librsvg2-rust
- mail/thunderbird
- multimedia/rav1e
- net-im/fractal
- net/rabbiteer
- net/routinator
- security/cargo-audit
- security/kr
- security/suricata
- sysutils/exa
- sysutils/fd
- sysutils/flowgger
- sysutils/hexyl
- sysutils/potnet
- textproc/bat
- textproc/ripgrep
- textproc/xsv-rs
- www/cliqz
- www/firefox-esr
- www/firefox
- www/geckodriver
- www/newsboat
- www/seamonkey
- www/websocat
- x11/admiral
- x11/alacritty
Diff Detail
- Lint
No Lint Coverage - Unit
No Test Coverage - Build Status
Buildable 21984 Build 21218: arc lint + arc unit
Event Timeline
Thank you, Jan. Can you crank the Rust version in cargo.mk too please?
lang/rust/files/patch-vendor_libc_src_unix_bsd_freebsdlike_dragonfly_mod.rs | ||
---|---|---|
1–7 | Why not svn mv these too? |
- Bump version for USES=cargo
- Regen diff with --find-copies-harder (breaks download link)
lang/rust/files/patch-vendor_libc_src_unix_bsd_freebsdlike_dragonfly_mod.rs | ||
---|---|---|
1–7 | I use Git which didn't detect this rename for some reason. Adding --find-copies-harder just after -C in ArcanistGitAPI.php didn't help. Any ideas? Subversion sucks for batching multiple commits and due to facilitating mistakes and poor commit messages. If you really want me to use Subversion directly be prepared I might screw up with probability as high as 60% i.e., better if someone else lands it. |
I use Git which didn't detect this rename for some reason. Adding --find-copies-harder just after -C in ArcanistGitAPI.php didn't help. Any ideas?
Subversion sucks for batching multiple commits and due to facilitating mistakes and poor commit messages. If you really want me to use Subversion directly be prepared I might screw up with probability as high as 60% i.e., better if someone else lands it.
Thanks for explaining. It looked like a job half done to me because several files are in fact registered as being renamed. Before you fight the tools leave it be. It's not that important.
(For some reason Phabricator refuses to allow me to post this inline...)