Remove the redundant amd(8) in base. It's old and we already have am-utils in ports.
I used git diff -U99999 which doesn't list the deleted files.
Differential D18579 Authored by cy on Dec 16 2018, 5:43 PM.
Details
Diff Detail
Event TimelineHerald added subscribers: emaste, bdrewery. · View Herald TranscriptDec 16 2018, 5:43 PM2018-12-16 17:43:41 (UTC+0) Harbormaster completed remote builds in B21599: Diff 52082.Dec 16 2018, 5:43 PM2018-12-16 17:43:44 (UTC+0) Comment Actions Age should not be a criteria for removal. BSD is old, very old, shall we remove it simply cause it is old? IMHO you all are getting way ahead of the process, having reviews to remove code before the cost/benefit and open discussions happens is backwards. Furthermore a review to remove a feature that does not first have a review to add deprecation notices is again, out of order. And finally a diff that does not actually show the deleted files is, well, rather hard to review. Comment Actions
I requested the removal since we already have autofs(5) for several years. It was discussed but left pending a while ago. FWIW, DragonFlyBSD did the same about 2 years ago.
I agree on those: It seems like we are missing a "svn rm" from the diff. Comment Actions I haven't figured out how to diff deleted files in git yet. I'll upload it soon. If people decide not to make a decision now this revision can be abandoned and I can save it for later. git stash is my friend. Comment Actions
I think you can work on the deprecation notice (manpages .. what else?)) right away .... that would act as a "heads up" for anyone that might object. Comment Actions git stash push -m amd-deletion I will add deprecation notices for deletion on March 31, 2019. Large DiffThis large diff affects 219 files. Files without inline comments have been collapsed. Expand All Files
Revision Contents
Diff 52084 |