Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

sysutils/DTraceToolkit: remove missing providers in FreeBSD 12.0-CURRRENT
ClosedPublic

Authored by dch on Jun 18 2018, 10:18 AM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
F81429450: D15879.id43994.diff
Tue, Apr 16, 5:52 AM
F81426575: D15879.id45202.diff
Tue, Apr 16, 4:42 AM
F81424288: D15879.id46141.diff
Tue, Apr 16, 3:53 AM
F81424268: D15879.id45202.diff
Tue, Apr 16, 3:52 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Mar 3 2024, 11:44 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Mar 3 2024, 11:44 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Mar 3 2024, 11:44 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Mar 3 2024, 11:44 PM
Subscribers

Details

Summary

dtruss fails as syscall::lstat*:return is no longer present.

This may well be a problem in FreeBSD src that needs addressing, but
might as well start with a working port for the moment.

dtruss is a super handy sysadmin-level trace tool that would be a shame
to lose.

Diff Detail

Repository
rP FreeBSD ports repository
Lint
Lint Not Applicable
Unit
Tests Not Applicable

Event Timeline

I'll admit that I've never seen any reason to prefer dtruss to truss(1).

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Jun 18 2018, 11:04 AM

Mmmm, there is no such thing as 12.0, yet. And when it comes out, it will definitively not have 1200000 as a version.

I think it would be better if you could track which OSVERSION bump is after the removal of those providers and use it instead.

In D15879#335907, @mat wrote:

Mmmm, there is no such thing as 12.0, yet. And when it comes out, it will definitively not have 1200000 as a version.
I think it would be better if you could track which OSVERSION bump is after the removal of those providers and use it instead.

Yes; I have no way of working that out other than wastefully building kernel/world/ports & re-trying it. IIRC, it broke just
before BSDCan 2017, looking through https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/versions.html this is most likely:

1200031 318736 May 23, 2017 12.0-CURRENT after types ino_t, dev_t, nlink_t were extended to 64bit and struct dirent changed layout (also known as ino64).

https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=318736 where lib/libc/sys/stat.c & lib/libc/sys/lstat.c were added.

For my reference, from 11.2-RC3. The last 2 are missing on 12.0-CURRENT.

dtrace -l syscall  |rg '\b[l ]stat'
67307        tcp            kernel                              none state-change
68948    syscall           freebsd                      compat.lstat entry
68949    syscall           freebsd                      compat.lstat return
69248    syscall           freebsd                             lstat entry
69249    syscall           freebsd                             lstat return

Options to move forward:

  • use 1200000 as the bracket and accept we're also excluding a period where this did work
  • use 1200031 and probably get pretty close but not be certain
  • hope Mark or Devin shares some insight on where/how providers are created for syscalls[1]
  • rebuild 12.0+ports at that point last year and bisect furiously

FWIW I also found that syscall::*lstat*:return works everywhere, so that is probably
the easiest option, but I'd still like to understand how dtrace providers are generated
for syscalls.

In D15879#336047, @dch wrote:

Options to move forward:

  • use 1200000 as the bracket and accept we're also excluding a period where this did work
  • use 1200031 and probably get pretty close but not be certain
  • hope Mark or Devin shares some insight on where/how providers are created for syscalls[1]
  • rebuild 12.0+ports at that point last year and bisect furiously

FWIW I also found that syscall::*lstat*:return works everywhere, so that is probably
the easiest option, but I'd still like to understand how dtrace providers are generated
for syscalls.

The magic happens in sys/cddl/dev/systrace/systrace.c

That relies on the similarly magical sys/kern/makesyscalls.sh

makesyscalls.sh reads sys/sys/syscall.h which we can see has changed with respect to lstat.

What was once SYS_lstat is now SYS_freebsd11_lstat.

If we do view annotated version of the file:

https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/sys/syscall.h?view=annotate

We can readily see that the change to introduce SYS_freebsd11_lstat was done May 23, 2017:

https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=318737

Now, we can work that back by setting a sticky bit in SVNweb to find out what the appropriate __FreeBSD_version value from sys/sys/param.h would be for the port Makefile:

https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/sys/param.h?view=log&pathrev=318737

So there you have it. As @dch suggests, the value of 1200031 was just prior 97 seconds before the change in syscalls, so I would say that is a really good anchor to choose. The next option, 1200032, is not a good choice as it is over 2 weeks later.

  • use wildcard to pick up compat* entries rather than ignore them
  • use more specific OSVERSION to match up point of breakage
This revision now requires review to proceed.Jul 2 2018, 10:10 PM
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Jul 2 2018, 11:28 PM
sysutils/DTraceToolkit/Makefile
91–94 ↗(On Diff #44777)

Are you sure about the -s flag here? I am of what install does when asked to symlink, and to strip at the same time.

sysutils/DTraceToolkit/files/extra-patch-dtruss
7–8 ↗(On Diff #44777)

Unless I am mistaken, *lstat* would also match lstat*, in which case, the patch could always be applied.

dch marked an inline comment as done.Jul 3 2018, 11:43 AM
dch added inline comments.
sysutils/DTraceToolkit/files/extra-patch-dtruss
7–8 ↗(On Diff #44777)

This did cross my mind, however this would also change the working behaviour for < 1200031 by including a number of other syscalls. This seems a reasonable compromise.

sysutils/DTraceToolkit/Makefile
91–94 ↗(On Diff #44777)

ping for this.

dch marked 4 inline comments as done.

fix last nit for {$RLN}

  • add manpage for dtruss(1)
  • add dtruss(1) to /usr/local/bin
This revision now requires review to proceed.Jul 12 2018, 10:21 AM
sysutils/DTraceToolkit/Makefile
91–94 ↗(On Diff #44777)

I suspect the port was previously updated from ln -s to {$RLN} and this was never removed.

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Jul 12 2018, 10:45 AM

ping @dteske are you ok for this to land? thanks!

sysutils/DTraceToolkit/Makefile
97 ↗(On Diff #45202)

Can you move dtruss to before hotkernel so that the order of entries on this line matches the order of RLN entries above (retaining pre-patch status)

dch marked an inline comment as done.Aug 1 2018, 6:19 PM
This revision now requires review to proceed.Aug 1 2018, 6:21 PM
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Aug 1 2018, 6:25 PM
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.